Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
portainyector encimera teka 60603008Der Injektorhalter fr Butangas Kochfelder Teka 60603007 ist ein Hilfsbauteil, das den Injektor auf dem Kochfeld von Gasherden hlt und befestigt. Seine Hauptfunktion besteht darin, die korrekte Fixierung und Ausrichtung des Injektors sicherzustellen, um einen angemessenen Gasfluss fr eine sichere und effiziente Verbrennung zu gewhrleisten. Welches Problem lst dieses Ersatzteil? Undichtigkeit oder schlechte Befestigung des Injektors auf dem Kochfeld
Der Injektorhalter für Butangas-Kochfelder Teka 60603007 ist ein Hilfsbauteil, das den Injektor auf dem Kochfeld von Gasherden hält und befestigt. Seine Hauptfunktion besteht darin, die korrekte Fixierung und Ausrichtung des Injektors sicherzustellen, um einen angemessenen Gasfluss für eine sichere und effiziente Verbrennung zu gewährleisten.
Welches Problem löst dieses Ersatzteil?
- Undichtigkeit oder schlechte Befestigung des Injektors auf dem Kochfeld
- Schwierigkeiten, die Flamme stabil zu halten aufgrund einer schlechten Halterung des Injektors
- Bruch oder Verschleiß der Originalhalterung, der die korrekte Nutzung des Injektors verhindert
Modelle:
Kompatibel mit bestimmten Modellen von Teka Butangas-Kochfeldern, sowohl in Ausführungen mit 3 als auch 4 Brennern.
| Marke | Kompatible Modelle |
|---|---|
| Teka | ECC 4G BUT, EC 3G.1P BUT VR01, ECC 4G BUT VR02, EC 3G.1P BUT VR03 |
Eigenschaften:
- Teileart: Hilfs-Injektorhalter für Butangas-Kochfeld
- Kompatible Marke: Teka
- Code/s: 60603007 (Original Teka)
- Ungefähre Maße: 2 cm Höhe x 2 cm Breite x 2 cm Tiefe
- Hitzebeständiges Material, kompatibel mit Butangas
Empfehlung:
Überprüfen Sie vor dem Kauf, ob der Code 60603007 mit der Teilenummer Ihres Teka-Herds übereinstimmt oder ob Ihr Kochfeldmodell zu den kompatiblen gehört, um eine perfekte Passform zu gewährleisten.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 1721 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
An Excellent Choice
Format: Paperback
Excellent introduction, notes and translation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2017
★★★★★ 5
Five Stars
Format: Paperback
Professor Cornford's translation with running commentary is definitive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2015
★★★★★ 5
Plato's dialogue about the physical world
Format: Paperback
The two biggest topics in the Timaeus are astronomy and the elements of bodies, which are constructed using triangles and the tetrahedron, octahedron, icosahedron, and cube. I would like to see a translation of the Timaeus that uses it as a way to introduce all the astronomy that appears in the dialogue. Introducing the astronomy does not mean just talking in words about spheres or the zodiac or the ecliptic, but actually explaining how these were used by astronomers. Cornford has much to say, but to someone who has not learned any Greek astronomy his commentary will be opaque and hard to use. I didn't know the astronomy well enough to readily understand Cornford's explanations. I plan to learn more classical Greek astronomy, perhaps using Evans'
, and then read Waterfield's translation of the Timaeus
.
Before reading this you should have read the Republic and know some classical Greek natural philosophy, mathematics, and astronomy. Although Cornford's commentary makes the dialogue staccato, I am glad for it because I wouldn't otherwise have understood much of what Plato says. The Timaeus and the Parmenides are the two dialogues of Plato that one needs commentary to understand; the Parmenides demands the commentary because so much of what is happening depends on the original language, and the Timaeus demands the commentary because of all the things the reader is supposed to be familiar with.
The following is a list of topics I kept while reading the dialogue: theory of Forms 27d-28a, 51a-52a; harmonics 35b-36b; time 37c-38e, 39b-e; vision 45b-46c, 67c-68d; space 52b; surfaces 53c; weight 62d-63e; sound 67a-67c; physiology 70c-79e, 80d-86a; antiperistasis 79e-80c.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 12, 2015
★★★★★ 4
Helpful, but Waterfield is better for an intro
Format: Paperback
This is basically a scholarly paragraph-by-paragraph commentary on the Timaeus. It's really good for what it is, but I don't recommend it as your first introduction to the Timaeus -- rather, I recommend Waterfield:
http://www.amazon.com/Timaeus-Critias-Oxford-Worlds-Classics-ebook/dp/B006NTMD16
A problem with using Cornford as an introduction is that he comments on everything, and it's hard to figure out what the main themes are. I tried reading Cornford as an intro and gave it up, but once I'd read Waterfield I found Cornford extremely helpful both in elucidating passages further than Waterfield does, and in interpreting passages Waterfield doesn't cover. So if you're looking to learn about the Timaeus, I'd suggest Waterfield first and Cornford second (or Cornford alongside Waterfield).
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2014
★★★★★ 5
Cornford's running commentary is arguably the best suited to fulfill this desire
Readers of any of Plato's works are bound to feel they might profit from various commentaries. His Timaeus, in particular, may be said to elicit such a hope because of number and intricacy of its details. Cornford's running commentary is arguably the best suited to fulfill this desire: it helps make clear the integrity of the dialogue as a whole and illumines the specific points along the way. Although this work is certainly dated, originally published in 1937, it is certainly one of the best full commentaries on the Timaeus.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2014