SKU: 33286479653

Enhanced | Carb-Tech

Sale price$44.99 Regular price$49.99
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $12.50 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 17 - Aug 22

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Enhanced | Carb-TechCluster Dextrin fuel with 5g creatine and 2g taurine Carb Tech is a no stim intra workout carb formula that keeps your training strong when the volume piles up and weak drinks show their limits. It skips the caffeine fake out and goes for real fuel, cell hydration, creatine recharge, and fatigue fighting. That's what sets it apart from pre workouts. It's not about getting hypedit's about staying strong longer. The star is 15,000mg of Cluster Dextrin,

Cluster Dextrin® fuel with 5g creatine and 2g taurine

Carb-Tech is a no-stim intra-workout carb formula that keeps your training strong when the volume piles up and weak drinks show their limits. It skips the caffeine fake-out and goes for real fuel, cell hydration, creatine recharge, and fatigue fighting. That's what sets it apart from pre-workouts. It's not about getting hyped—it's about staying strong longer.

The star is 15,000mg of Cluster Dextrin®, a branded highly branched cyclic dextrin from Glico Nutrition. It's got high molecular weight and low osmolality—meaning it passes through your stomach fast while giving solid carb support. In real life, that means less bloating than old-school carb powders and steady energy for long, draining sessions. If your workouts fade mid-way, you'll notice this first: better endurance, fuller muscles, and no flat feeling.

The creatine setup stands out too. You get 2,000mg creatine monohydrate, 2,000mg creatine gluconate, and 1,000mg magnesium creatine chelate for 5g total. That's the sweet spot of 3-5g daily that helps recharge muscle energy, boost strength, handle more volume, and build lean mass over time. Monohydrate is the top dog; the others mix it up with carbs and magnesium for workout vibes. You won't feel a quick rush, but you'll see better power repeats and steady gains as your muscles stay loaded.

Key Highlights

  • 15,000mg Cluster Dextrin® — a solid intra-workout carb hit from highly branched cyclic dextrin, a top carb type that empties from your stomach fast with low osmolality. That means real fuel without the gut bomb you get from basic carb powders.
  • Full 5g creatine matrix — 2g creatine monohydrate, 2g creatine gluconate, and 1g magnesium creatine chelate. This hits the proven daily range that boosts strength, power, volume, and long-term muscle gains.
  • 2,000mg taurine — a good dose in the 1-3g range from studies. Taurine helps with cell hydration, calcium flow, and muscle work, so your sessions feel smoother and tougher to break.
  • 2,000mg beta-alanine — here for building carnosine and fighting acid in intense sets. It's under the usual 3.2g full dose, so call it a solid helper, not the main event.
  • Magnesium from bisglycinate chelate and magnesium creatine chelate — smarter than cheap oxide junk in budget formulas. Magnesium stabilizes ATP and helps nerves and muscles, key for tough workouts.
  • Stim-free on purpose — supports your training without caffeine, great for late sessions or stacking with your pre. It's all about fuel, hydration, and energy systems, not jacking up your nerves.
  • No proprietary blend — every ingredient and dose is right there. While lots of carb drinks hide stuff, Carb-Tech shows exactly how much creatine, taurine, beta-alanine, and Cluster Dextrin® you're getting.
  • Trace mineral support for metabolic function — iodine, selenium, chromium, copper, and manganese in helpful amounts. Not huge doses, but they back up thyroid, antioxidants, and carb use around workouts.

Who Is This For?

  • Bodybuilders in high-volume phases who train better with fuel. 15g Cluster Dextrin® keeps output up in long sessions, 5g creatine and 2g taurine help contractions and repeats as fatigue hits.
  • CrossFit and functional folks in intense repeats where carbs and buffering count. Gives intra carbs, creatine, beta-alanine without extra stims on top of training stress.
  • Strength lifters in high-work blocks needing bar speed and quality. Creatine aids energy turnover, carbs fight mid-session drop.
  • Evening trainers wanting support without sleep-wrecking caffeine. Fully stim-free for post-work or late nights, balancing gym and recovery.
  • Athletes with pre but mid-session fade. Adds substrate and hydration, smarter than more caffeine for long hauls.
  • Hardgainers and high-output types struggling with weight, fullness, quality in tough blocks. Quick carbs, creatine, taurine make sessions productive, cut depleted looks.

How to Use

Mix one scoop of Carb-Tech in a big shaker with 20-30 oz cold water, start drinking 10-15 minutes before and sip during. It's made for intra fuel, not stim timing. New to carbs or beta-alanine? Try half to check gut and tingle.

More water keeps it light for hard sessions. Shaker beats stirring for even mix. Works with or without food, best in fasted or light pre-meal spots. Stacks easy with pre since no stims.

For best buildup, use on training days so 5g creatine loads muscles and 2g beta-alanine adds to carnosine. No cycling needed. Store sealed, cool, dry—carbs clump with moisture.

What to Expect

Minutes 0-10: First off, it drinks easy—like a real sports drink, not a thick shake. Cluster Dextrin® sits light, no caffeine rush.

Minutes 10-20: If beta-alanine tingles you, the 2g might give a light buzz, milder than heavy pre's. Hydration and gut feel stand out as you start.

Minutes 20-40: Here's where it shines. Carbs and taurine keep muscles full and energy even, great for short rests or building volume.

Minutes 40-90: No peak and crash—just less late drop. Less exciting than stims, but better for real output.

Days 1-7: Carbs, taurine, hydration hit quick. Weeks 2-4: Creatine loads up, beta-alanine builds carnosine with steady use.

Frequently Asked Questions

What kind of product is Enhanced | Carb-Tech?

Carb-Tech is a stim-free intra-workout performance formula built around 15,000mg Cluster Dextrin®, a 5g total creatine matrix, 2,000mg taurine, and 2,000mg beta-alanine. It is designed to support training fuel, hydration, repeat performance, and reduced late-session drop-off rather than provide caffeine-based energy.

How much creatine does Carb-Tech provide per serving?

Carb-Tech provides 5,000mg total creatine per serving from 2,000mg creatine monohydrate, 2,000mg creatine gluconate, and 1,000mg magnesium creatine chelate. That total lands right in the evidence-based daily range commonly used to support strength, power, and training volume.

Is the beta-alanine dose in Carb-Tech a full clinical dose?

Not as a standalone serving. Carb-Tech contains 2,000mg beta-alanine, while the most common research-supported daily range is 3,200-6,400mg. That means this is a supportive dose that contributes to cumulative intake, but it is not a full standalone clinical loading dose by itself.

When should I take Carb-Tech?

The best use case is to start drinking it about 10-15 minutes before training and then sip it throughout the session. That timing fits the formula's purpose: Cluster Dextrin® is there to provide workout fuel, while taurine and the creatine matrix support performance as the session progresses.

Does Carb-Tech contain caffeine or stimulants?

No. Carb-Tech is completely stim-free, which makes it a strong option for evening training or for stacking with your existing pre-workout without pushing caffeine intake too high.

Can I stack Carb-Tech with a pre-workout?

Yes, and that is one of its best use cases. Because Carb-Tech has no stimulants, it combines easily with a pre-workout to add actual workout fuel, hydration support, taurine, and daily creatine intake instead of just adding more caffeine.

Is Cluster Dextrin® better than regular carb powder?

Cluster Dextrin® is a premium highly branched cyclic dextrin known for high molecular weight and low osmolality, which generally helps it empty from the stomach quickly and feel lighter during training. That is why many athletes prefer it over thicker, heavier carb sources when they need fuel without GI drag.

Will Carb-Tech cause the beta-alanine tingles?

It can, but usually less intensely than higher-dose pre-workouts. The formula contains 2,000mg beta-alanine, so sensitive users may notice a mild tingling sensation, especially when taken with little food.

Do I need to cycle Carb-Tech?

No stimulant cycling is needed because there is no caffeine. In fact, consistent use makes more sense physiologically because creatine benefits from maintained saturation and beta-alanine works through progressive carnosine loading over time.

Is Carb-Tech mainly for bodybuilders, or can endurance athletes use it too?

It works well for both, as long as the activity involves meaningful glycogen demand or repeated high-intensity efforts. Bodybuilders benefit from better training fullness and volume support, while functional fitness and repeated sprint athletes benefit from carb delivery, taurine, creatine, and beta-alanine support.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 33286479653

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
T
Verified Purchase
Trader Dave
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Easy to read. Line spacing is just right! Thank you!
Format: Paperback
Michael Van Vlymen delivers the lived from experience truth once again! Michael is down to earth and matter of fact as he writes. He is heavenly minded every day! I've grown more in love with Jesus because of his testimony of heavenly realms operating on the earthly realm. My eyes have been opened much much more as I listen and read Mikes well illustrated books and videos!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2025
O
Verified Purchase
Online shopper
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Challenge Accepted
Format: Kindle
I liked the book. It challenged my position of focusing on the light and ignoring the darkness. It challenges me to desire the whole experience of spiritual awareness and sight and to become adept in living as a watchman.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
Tim Chaffey
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Outstanding, compelling, and thorough work on the historicity or non-historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus
Format: Paperback
I had been looking forward to reading this book since the first time I heard about it. I was sitting in Dr. Gary Habermas' class on miracles and he told us about Mike Licona, who was currently working on his dissertation on the Resurrection. Although it was published in 2010, I finally had the opportunity to read it over the past few months. At over 700 pages, including an extensive bibliography and over 2,000 footnotes, this book is not a light read by any stretch of the imagination. As the subtitle states, this is a book dealing with historiography. Readers looking for a deep theological treatment on the Resurrection of Christ may want to look elsewhere since Licona's focus here is not theology, but history (although there is still a good deal of theology). Using methodological principles agreed upon by a vast number of historians from a variety of religious and philosophical backgrounds, he sets out to determine whether or not the historian "is warranted in regarding Jesus' resurrection as an event that occurred in the past" (p. 610). Surprisingly, the book consists of only five chapters and one appendix, so each chapter averages more than 100 pages in length. Also, the second half of the book contains a significant amount of Greek, giving me a good opportunity to brush up on that. If you can't read Greek, don't worry, Dr. Licona provides an English translation throughout. The first section deals with a significant number of preliminary considerations. There is an excellent critique of the skeptical postmodern view of history and a complete dismantling of the beliefs of Jesus "mythers" (those who claim Jesus never existed). There's also a good discussion on horizons (the presuppositions and biases we all have). While total neutrality may not be possible, Licona gives several principles historians should implement to help them transcend their horizon. Finally, he provides an honest discussion of his own biases so that readers are well aware of where he is coming from. The second chapter focuses on whether or not miracles fall within the purview of the historian. Licona addresses the popular objections of David Hume and Bart Ehrman, as well as McCullagh, Meier, Wedderburn, and Dunn. Many skeptics simply have an a priori objection to miracles, so they aren't willing to even consider the possibility that historical evidence for a miracle may exist. There's an interesting discussion on the burden of proof as it relates to the historicity of miracle claims. I thought the following quote summarized the nature of evidence when it comes to miracle claims: "It is the responsibility of the historian to consider what the evidence would look like if she were not wearing her metaphysical bias like a pair of sunglasses that shade the world. It is not the responsibility of the evidence to shine so brightly that they render such glasses ineffectual." (p. 196) With all the preliminary matters out of the way, Dr. Licona gets down to the business of doing history. Chapter three examines the historical sources pertaining to Christ's Resurrection. Many Christians may object to the methodology employed in this chapter since he does not automatically accept every biblical passage on the subject as evidence, but bear in mind that Licona is doing his best to transcend his own Christian horizon to be as neutral as possible. He discusses over two dozen early sources and rates them as "unlikely, possible-minus, possible, possible-plus, highly probable, indeterminate [or] not useful" (p. 201). The fourth chapter uncovers the historical bedrock pertaining to the fate of Jesus. This approach follows on the heels of the exhaustive work of Dr. Habermas who, since 1975, has kept track of over 3,400 academic works from scholars of various stripes on the Resurrection in English, German, and French. From this research, Dr. Habermas has shown that there are 12 facts accepted by the vast majority of scholars. He has reduced this to six best attested details in what he calls the "minimal facts" approach. Each of these facts are discussed, but Dr. Licona narrows this down to three facts that nearly all scholars agree upon: 1) Jesus died by crucifixion, 2) the disciples had experiences that led them to believe and proclaim that Jesus had risen from the dead, and 3) Paul converted to Christianity after experiencing what he believed to be a post-Resurrection appearance of Jesus. There's also a lengthy discussion on what "resurrection" meant to Jewish and Christian audiences in the first century. The information contained in this chapter is often completely ignored by agnostics, atheists, Muslims, and others who do not want to even consider the Resurrection as a possibility. I have had many discussions with skeptics who display naivete when they claim that there is no evidence to support the claim that Jesus rose from the dead. It's one thing to disbelieve in the event, but it's an entirely different thing to completely ignore or to willingly remain ignorant of the historical bedrock pertaining to the fate of Jesus. The fifth and final chapter of the book examines six different hypotheses that attempt to explain what happened to Jesus after being crucified. Along with the traditional Christian understanding of the Resurrection, the views promoted by Vermes, Goulder, Ludemann, Crossen, and Craffert are weighed in terms of their explanatory scope, explanatory power, plausibility, the amount of ad hoc elements, and illumination for solving problems associated with the subject. An appendix also examines Dale Allison's work on the Resurrection according to the same criteria. The traditional Resurrection hypothesis is the only view that fulfills all five criteria, and it outdistances the other views by a wide margin. Critics can claim that Licona merely concluded what he hoped to prove, but they must be able to point out flaws in his methodology, since his conclusion most certainly follows from the data when historiographical principles are applied. My biggest concern with the book is found in the fifth chapter. While discussing the strange events described in Matthew 27:51-53, Licona suggested that the passage was not describing historical events but employing apocalyptic language to show that a significant person had died. Such descriptions were not uncommon in the ancient world when describing the death of important people. This comment has set off a wave of criticism from conservative Christian scholars like Norman Geisler and Al Mohler. I disagree with Licona's statement and share some of the same concerns as Geisler and Mohler. But when I consider the context and methodology being used in the book, I don't find it to be quite as grievous an error as some have claimed. Skeptics will undoubtedly continue to dismiss the Resurrection of Christ, but they must deal with the research in this book or they simply are not interacting with the latest scholarship. Dr. Licona's work raises the bar when it comes to the most important subject we could ever study: the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. I highly recommend it for anyone interested in this subject who is up to the task of reading an academic work. I have studied the subject for years, but I still learned a lot and will treasure this book as an extremely valuable resource. Even though I disagree with his take on Matt. 27:51-53, I still need to give the book five stars since I don't need to agree with the author on every point for me to give a positive review and recognize the book's worth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 30, 2012
B
Verified Purchase
Brant Jones
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Brilliant, rigorous, balanced, and approachable
Format: Paperback
"The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach," by Michael R. Licona is an outstanding, thorough yet highly approachable assessment of the evidence, sources, and explanatory hypotheses for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. As the subtitle suggests, it borrows significant methodological rigor and best practices from the field of historical analysis and applies them to biblical scholarship. Licona begins his assessment with a meticulous discussion of his historical analysis methodology. Included in this section is his definition of five criteria he uses to assess a set of explanatory hypotheses. He then uses those assessments to weigh the hypotheses based on nine levels of certainty ranging from “certainly not historical” to “certainly historical.” The hypothesis representing the best explanation for the resurrection of Christ is the one rated highest in historical certainty based on the five criteria. At the outset of the book, Licona also includes a robust discussion of historical analysis influences and issues because evaluating them openly is essential to his methodical approach and because they aren’t often discussed in biblical studies. It is in this section that he does something quite unique and insightful; Licona includes a full discussion of knowledge, experiences, worldviews, preferences and other influences, which he calls “horizons,” that tend to bias the assessment of history. Furthermore, he defines a set of six methods that he uses throughout the book to avoid his own biases as he strives to present outcomes based on methodical neutrality. It’s quite brilliant. Licona even includes a confession of his own “horizons” - his potential influences. With all this foundation in place, Licona proceeds to identify all sources of evidence for the resurrection of Christ and rates each according to its likelihood of providing reliable independent testimony. Included in this assessment are sources from the Bible, early Christian writers, non-biblical Christian literature and early non-Christian writers. He then uses the most reliable sources as the basis for attesting to the reliability for all the available evidence for the resurrection. This produces three pieces of evidence that he calls “historical bedrock” because they are well attested within multiple reliable sources and are validated by a broad range of scholars. In the final section of the book, Licona evaluates major assertions against the resurrection from skeptics and compares the results against a parallel evaluation of the resurrection hypothesis. Specifically, he uses his criteria and rating system to assess how well hypotheses from a range of skeptical scholars, like Gerd Ludemann and John Dominic Crossan, are able to explain the historical bedrock evidence. At the end of this extensive analysis, the biblical resurrection hypothesis is by far the most credible explanation for historical bedrock evidence associated with the resurrection of Jesus Christ. As noted above, Michael Licona’s book is an excellent assessment of the evidence, sources and competing hypotheses associated with the resurrection of Christ. The author uniquely applies the meticulousness of best practice historical analysis methodology to arguably the most important of all biblical questions. Using rigorous criteria and rating scales, Licona delivers a fair and balanced evaluation that achieves the methodical neutrality he was striving for while minimizing, as best as possible, influences from his “horizons.” It’s also worth noting that Licona assesses a broad range of possible sources, including those classified as gnostic and pseudepigraphal, and includes viewpoints from a broad range of scholars, supportive and skeptical alike. Furthermore, the author includes a very robust set of footnotes on the various topics discussed within the book. These footnotes are helpful for both scholars and non-scholars looking for a deeper understanding or pointers for additional exploration plus they include additional explanatory comments that complement Licona’s focus on delivering a fair and balanced assessment. The one issue I found while reading the book was its treatment of the empty tomb evidence. I was disappointed the author’s discussion was brief since I was looking forward to a robust evaluation. However, in his defense, Licona was looking for historical bedrock evidence that could be used to assess the various resurrection hypotheses. A large number of scholars are skeptical of the empty tomb so it doesn’t belong in his historical bedrock category. Beside this one brief moment of disappointment, I was greatly pleased with the totality of Licona’s analysis and outcomes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2021
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Detailed examination
Format: Paperback
The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach is thus far my favorite textbook to refer to when exploring the Jesus’ resurrection. If you are looking for a timeless, structured, methodical, and systematic approach to the resurrection of Jesus, then this is the book for you. Although the massiveness of the volume can be intimidating, Licona’s scholarly work is well-written and easily followed, making it suitable for both scholars and layman. Rather than jump straight into the historical evidence for Jesus’ resurrection, as others do, Licona begins by discussing the nature of history, truth, bias, burden of proof, and method. In so doing Licona makes clear what his methodology is, and that is, to carefully establish a core of facts (called the historical bedrock) and evaluate which hypothesis best meets those facts according to the standard historical criteria (e.g., explanatory scope and power), which can also be referred to as a minimal facts approach. After these more metaphysical topics, Licona provides details all (or nearly all) relevant ancient texts surrounding the resurrection. And after a lengthy discussion on the historical bedrock, Licona weighs six hypotheses (five of which being naturalistic hypotheses), concluding that the resurrection hypothesis is the only one that meets all of the historical criteria. One of the many strengths of his book is that it attempts to look at the historical research for the resurrection of Jesus from an unbiased perspective. His attempt is to limit what he refers to as his “horizon”—his lens of prior beliefs and experiences that make him biased to the evidence. Licona cites and deals with a vast number of nonbiblical sources and skeptical scholars. I would gladly say that Licona does so with modesty and integrity. For skeptics, they should be easily able to interact with this text with gratitude and enthusiasm. For some Christians, though, Licona can seem a bit too unbiased. If you are looking for an examination of the resurrection of Jesus that does not address challenges and tough questions honestly, then this probably isn’t the book for you. There are occasional instances where some may find Licona’s conclusions to seem too critical. For instance in his assigned historical value to the canonical Gospels and in his historical bedrock. (Spoiler) Licona only includes three facts in his historical bedrock, omitting the historical fact of the empty tomb (although he does consider it a second-order fact). The reason for both are based on the historical method and standard criteria. While some may disagree with his conclusions, there is no doubt in Licona’s consistency. The only other downside to the textbook is that it does not have the wherewithal to go into deep discussion on certain topics, like the historical reliability for the empty tomb. Doing a deep dive into individual topics like such would result in a much larger volume. So, if you are looking for an exhaustive exploration into a specific topic, this may not be the right text for you. That is not to discredit the comprehensiveness that Licona does provide! Despite its inexhaustiveness, Licona does give a number of sources one could use for a deeper search into a specific topic. Overall, if you are a Christian who wants to research the skeptical challenges facing the resurrection and you want to know how to construct a minimal facts approach to the resurrection of Jesus, or if you are a skeptic who desires to know more about the subject and interact with the top Christian historians, then this is the book for you.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 29, 2023

recommand products